Baroness Susan Greenfield looks at the
crazy attitudes that push women out of science in today's
Observer newspaper. Refreshingly, the Observer also devotes three pages to science, based on Tim Adams asking
why we are in a new age of scientific ignorance. Poorly paid and under-resourced science teachers, a bonkers university funding system that lets media studies thrive and science wither, crap pay for science academics, poor reporting of science in the UK media is my guess. Next! It's a good Sunday for science: the
Sunday Times profiles scientist
Craig Venter whose methods (going round the world on a boat discovering things) have caused many to hyperventerlate. We like him. Happy to perpetuate a stereotype, whichever subeditor yakked up the headline called Venter 'mad'. Which in this case is probably shorthand for 'He's cleverer than me by an order of magnitude and a billionaire. Not that I'm bitter.'
And our cluster map tells us we
have readers in Canada, so raise a glass in their general direction and wish them a very happy Canada Day.
To neatly combine these two threads, let's recap the sorry tale of
Inkycircus, a thoroughly good science blog written by three women. Based in London, they wanted to open a science magazine aimed at? Women. What a bonzer idea, but this being Britain it was doomed. Two of the Inkettes are foringers: Canadian and American, and not being rich enough, married enough or criminally unprincipled enough, they were desired to bog off home. They took their good idea with them and have since set up their magazine
Inkling in Canada. Read the sorry tale in their own words
here.
Labels: eegits, science journalism